Item

End-of-life decisions: a cross-national study of treatment preference discussions and surrogate decision-maker appointments

Evans, N.
Pasman, H.R.
Vega Alonso, T.
Van den Block, L.
Miccinesi, G.
Van Casteren, Viviane
Donker, G.A.
Bertolissi, S.
Zurriaga, O.
Deliens, L.
... show 1 more
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Making treatment decisions in anticipation of possible future incapacity is an important part of patient participation in end-of-life decision-making. This study estimates and compares the prevalence of GP-patient end-of-life treatment discussions and patients' appointment of surrogate decision-makers in Italy, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands and examines associated factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective survey was conducted with representative GP networks in four countries. GPs recorded the health and care characteristics in the last three months of life of 4,396 patients who died non-suddenly. Prevalences were estimated and logistic regressions were used to examine between country differences and country-specific associated patient and care factors. RESULTS: GP-patient discussion of treatment preferences occurred for 10%, 7%, 25% and 47% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and of Dutch patients respectively. Furthermore, 6%, 5%, 16% and 29% of Italian, Spanish, Belgian and Dutch patients had a surrogate decision-maker. Despite some country-specific differences, previous GP-patient discussion of primary diagnosis, more frequent GP contact, GP provision of palliative care, the importance of palliative care as a treatment aim and place of death were positively associated with preference discussions or surrogate appointments. A diagnosis of dementia was negatively associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed a higher prevalence of treatment preference discussions and surrogate appointments in the two northern compared to the two southern European countries. Factors associated with preference discussions and surrogate appointments suggest that delaying diagnosis discussions impedes anticipatory planning, whereas early preference discussions, particularly for dementia patients, and the provision of palliative care encourage participation

Description
Date
2013-06-30
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Chapter title
Publication type
Peer reviewed scientific article
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
article, AS, Belgian, Belgium, care, CONTACT, Countries, cross sectional, cross-national, Cross-sectional, Death, Decision, Decision Making, Dementia, Diagnosis, differences, Discussion, electronic, End-of-life, European, European countries, factors, GP, health, im, Institute, IS, ITALY, journal, Life, Logistic, logistic regression, Logistic-regression, medical, method, methods, Netherlands, Network, networks, OCCUPATIONAL, Occupational Health, Participation, Patient, patients, Planning, prevalence, public, regression, Research, Research Support, result, results, SB - IM, Spain, study, surrogate, survey, The Netherlands, treatment, Universities, university, WHO
Citation
Topic(s)
Related project
Embedded videos