Item

Declining offloading rates in Belgian Recognized Diabetic Foot Clinics (RDFC): results from an audit-feedback quality improvement initiative.

Dumont, Isabelle
Deschamps, Kevin
Eenkhoorn, Vera
Félix, Patricia
Houthoofd, Sabrina
Lauwers, Patrick
Matricali, Giovanni A.
Randon, Caren
Weber, Eric
Doggen, Kris
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate how DFU (Diabetic Foot Ulcer) are offloaded in RDFC and the evolution over time. RDFC receive their results after each audit for benchmarking (IQED-Foot project).

;

Method: Comparison of offloading methods used in 2 audits (2011 and 2013/14). Audits characteristics are described in table 1. In each audit, RDFC registered the first 52 diabetic patients over a 1-year period with a “new” foot problem: DFU of Wagner grade 2 or more and/or active Charcot foot (table 2). Off-loading was categorized as follows: 1. knee-high device, removable or not (TCC, Diabetic walkers...), 2 ankle-high shoe or cast shoe, 3. other off-loading techniques around the ulcer (felt, orthoses). 4. No off-loading. In case of multiple means of off-loading, the most elaborate one was selected.

;

Results /Discussion: Population characteristics in 2013/14 are described in table 3. For plantar ulcers, the overall offloading rate diminished significantly between 2011 and 2013/14, from 84.6% to 76.3% (P=0.01). A non-significant decrease was observed in the use of shoes (42.3 and 34.7% in 2011 and 2013/14 respectively, P>0.05), and no decrease in knee-high off-loading (14.8 and 14.7%) and other off-loading techniques (24.8 and 23.4%). For dorsal ulcers,  the overall off-loading rates were lower and the decline between 2011 and 2013/14 more pronounced (73.1 and 53.7%, P<0.001), affecting both ankle-high off-loading (31.1 and 21.9%, P=0.02) and other off-loading techniques (30.4 and 19.9%, P=0.02), but not knee-high off-loading (7.0 and 8.1%).

;

Conclusion: Periodical audits in Belgian Recognized Diabetic Foot Clinics have shown a decline in offloading rates. The percentage of patients without any offloading device is increasing. Audit and feedback including non-public anonymous benchmarking has not been able to prevent this decline. Knowing that offloading is the cornerstone of DFU treatment these results are worrying, although overall off-loading rates were comparable to those reported in Eurodiale. Efforts are needed to understand and tackle the barriers towards a correct application of gold standard offloading techniques.

Description
Date
2017-07-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Diabetic Foot Study Group
Chapter title
Publication type
Scientific poster, presentation or proceeding
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Citation
Topic(s)
Related project
Embedded videos