Liquid-based cervical cytology using ThinPrep technology: weighing the pros and cons in a cost-effectiveness analysis
de Bekker-Grob, E.W. de Kok, I.M. Bulten, J. van Rosmalen, J. Vedder, J.E.M. Klinkhamer, P.J.J.M. Siebers, A.G. van Ballegooijen, M.
de Bekker-Grob, E.W.
de Kok, I.M.
Bulten, J.
van Rosmalen, J.
Vedder, J.E.M.
Klinkhamer, P.J.J.M.
Siebers, A.G.
van Ballegooijen, M.
Citations
Altmetric:
Abstract
PURPOSE:
Description
Date
2012-06-17
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Chapter title
Publication type
Peer reviewed scientific article
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Keywords
Advantages, alternative, Analyses, AS, at, Belgian Foundation Against Cancer, cancer, cancer screening, Cervical, cervical cancer, cervical cancer screening, CERVICAL-CANCER, cervix, Change, cit_Marbyn, conditions, conventional, Cost, Cost effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, COSTS, cytology, data, ECCG, EU, EUROCHIP, EUROCOURSE, Evaluating, Follow up, FOLLOW-UP, HPV, Human, implementation, IS, Less, Life, method, methods, MODEL, monolayer cytology, Netherlands, PREHDICT, Quality, Quality of Life, RCT, Research, result, results, SCREENING, SENSITIVITY, Strategies, Strategy, System, Test, threshold, triage, values, WOMEN